Bubbles Protocol

Introduction

In the field of distributed systems our DAG framework brings in dynamic cells and columnar tables which completely transform the way we manage data. By utilizing zk STARKs technology we prioritize privacy while still maintaining processing speeds. What sets us apart is our approach of providing permanent data storage for a single payment aiming to render traditional data structures and blockchains outdated. Our newest solutions, sharded file systems and clustered communication channels, offer an effective distribution of the data within cells, and a scalable way to communicate with this data, no matter how loaded the system is.

Basic Concepts:

Signatures: Ed25519, high speed - high security signatures.
Proofs: zk-STARKs, zero-knowledge scalable transparent arguments of knowledge.
Consensus: Flipper Loop, a practical byzantine fault tolerance consensus algorithm.
Recall Cell: Introduced by Arweave we will use a recall algorithm to ensure that nodes store as much data as they can.

1. Cells

In our architecture, which is built on the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) we organize data storage by employing cells as the units. These cells, analogous to the blocks in a blockchain have been created to find a harmonious equilibrium, between optimizing storage efficiency and facilitating swift data retrieval.

1.1 Components of a Cell:

A cell $C$ is mathematically represented as a tuple: $C=(H,DT,S)$

Where:

$H$ encompasses metadata which includes transaction details, timestamp, and links to child and parent cells.
$DT$ signifies the Data Table stored within the cell, encapsulating structured data. This data can be in the form of rows of records, key-value pairs, or other intricate structures.
$S$ denotes the size of the cell, indicating its data holding capacity.

1.2 Mathematical Model for Cell Division:

When transactions become highly complex and surpass a threshold it becomes necessary to segment cells, for efficient storage. On division: $DT=BC+ΣiRCi$

Where:

$BC$ represents the Base Cell containing the primary transaction data.
$RCi$ are the Reference Cells. They are dynamic constructs provisioned to house any overflow or intricate data that the Base Cell cannot accommodate.

1.3 Adaptive Cell Division:

Cells are considered to be storage units for information. When the amount of data reaches the limit of a cell the system intelligently redistributes the data, among fresh cells to ensure optimal use.

Simple Transactions: Simple transactions are conveniently stored in a Base Cell.
Complex Transactions: For complex transactions the system uses a main cell in combination, with multiple reference cells..

1.4 Cell Linkage Strategy:

Each cell within the DAG structure holds connections, to its preceding cells allowing for a yet organized organization of data..

Versioning: Data tables stored in a cell cannot be changed once created. Instead when an update is made a new cell is generated containing the updated data table. This new cell is then connected to its version through a pointer showing the evolution of the data..
Merkle Proofs: To guarantee the genuineness and reliability of tables contained in cells Merkle Trees are utilized. The root hash of the Merkle Tree is included in the cell header ensuring data integrity and enabling validation of membership.

2. Columnar Data Tables

In our network of interconnected DAG cells structured data tables play a role, in organizing storage and expediting data retrieval.

2.1 Columnar Storage Formalism

Imagine each cell, let's call it $C$ , holding a neatly arranged table $T$ . We store data in columns, visualized as: $T={c1,c2,...,cn}$ Here, each $ci$ is just a column in that table.

Benefits:

Compression: Data, in columns can be compressed more efficiently..
Query Performance: Fetching a column, cost-wise, is quicker than pulling out entire rows.

2.2 Indexing Simplified

When searching for data in column $ci$ using a query $q$ :

Primary Indexing: We have a special index, $Ip$ , which helps find data faster based on certain keys.
Secondary Indexing: There's also a backup set of indices, $Is$ , enhancing the speed even further for specific search patterns.

2.3 Partitioning Explained

We can split table $T$ into parts based on a column, like $ci$ . Think of this as: $P(T,ci)={T1,T2,...,Tk}$ Here, each $Tj$ is a slice or partition of the main table.

2.4 Merkle Proofs for Trustworthiness

For any table $T$ , we create a security feature, a Merkle tree, labeled $M(T)$ . The main hash, $RM$ , is stored securely and verifies that our data is genuine and unchanged.

2.5 Adapting to Changes

When we update or change table $T$ by $ΔT$ , we get a new version: $T′=T+ΔT$ But remember, we always keep the original $T$ safe and unchanged in its own cell.

2.6 Scaling Up Smartly

As the table $T$ grows:

Dynamic Expansion: If our table gets too big, we create additional Reference Cells, $RC$ , to manage this growth.
Load Distribution: We spread data evenly so no single cell gets overwhelmed.

In a nutshell, the data tables within our DAG cells, with a touch of mathematical elegance, manage to efficiently store, protect, and scale data, true to the principles of DAG.

3. Dynamic Reference Mechanism

The DAG framework incorporates a DRM (Dynamic Reference Mechanism) that improves the efficiency of storing and retrieving data. The DRM is specifically designed to adapt to data and ensure accurate data management while optimizing memory usage through advanced referencing techniques.

3.1 Detailed Insight into Reference Parameters

Reference Threshold (𝜃): This threshold indicates when the primary cell's data content requires the initiation of reference cells. As the dataset size within a primary cell surpasses ( 𝜃 ), the DRM engages, paving the way for reference cells and streamlining data distribution.
Maximum References (𝜔): An upper boundary that dictates the number of reference cells directly linked to a primary cell. When the dataset demands more reference cells than ( 𝜔 ), the system employs advanced techniques such as data compression, hierarchical referencing, or innovative fragmentation.

3.2 Mathematical Framework Behind Reference Logic

For a given cell, ( C ), with a dataset ( D ), the reference cell initiation is based on:

f(D)=\frac{f}{0}

Where:

( F(D) ) represents the predicted count of reference cells based on the dataset's size.
( f ) indicates the data size within cell ( C ).

3.3 The Intricacies of Hierarchical Referencing

Hierarchical referencing is essential for complex datasets or those requiring numerous references:

Primary Reference Cell (RC1): The first reference cell created when ( 𝜃 ) is exceeded.
Secondary & Tertiary References: If a cell's reference count exceeds ( 𝜔 ), the DRM initiates secondary (RC2) or deeper nested cells, creating a multi-layered reference chain.

3.4 Real-time Adaptability of References

DRM's adaptability feature includes:

Reference Merging: When data changes and multiple reference cells are active, the DRM consolidates reference cells to optimize memory usage.
Adaptive Logic: Using ( R ) to represent the current set of reference cells and ( D' ) for the modified data:

g(R, D') = h(\text{merged references})

This equation depicts the DRM's dynamic reconfiguration.

3.5 Expansion of Data Nodes with Reference Evolution

The DRM evolves with data growth. By creating new data nodes and mapping them through reference cells, it's equipped to manage increased data without performance degradation.

3.6 Augmented Security through Referencing

Each reference that is generated possesses a cryptographic signature guaranteeing the integrity and security of data throughout the processes of storage and retrieval.

3.7 Future Prospects and Scalability

The DRM's design is future-proof. Continuous research ensures integration of advanced algorithms, better data compression techniques, and efficient scalability with growing data demands.

4. Sharded File Systems

Using our architecture based on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) bolstered by specialized cells and advanced referencing techniques we have developed the Decentralized File System (DFS). This cutting edge storage solution is specifically designed to address the challenges of times. The DFS offers scalability, resilience and exceptional performance, in environments. Moreover it is built to efficiently manage volumes of data and effectively handle node failures.

4.1 Cell Sharding:

In our Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) cells represent the units, for storing data. To improve how data is distributed in the Distributed File System (DFS) we have implemented a mechanism that divides cells into smaller and more optimized partitions known as shards. This approach boosts parallelism leading to data storage and quicker retrieval.

Parameters:

$C$ : Data stored within a cell.
$n$ : Intended number of shards.
$Si$ : Represents the $ith$ shard segmented from the cell data.

Mathematical Formulation: For a specified cell data $C$ , it's systematically partitioned into $nn$ shards, ensuring the equation: $C=⋃i=1nSi$ This guarantees: $∣C∣=∑i=1n∣Si∣$

Inputs:

Data $C$ extracted from a cell.
Desired shard count $n$ .

Outputs:

Array of Shards: ${S1,S2,...,Sn}$ .

4.2 Reference Redundancy:

Sometimes the way DAG is designed can lead to vulnerabilities where cells may become inaccessible when nodes malfunction. To address this issue we have implemented a replication strategy that plays a vital role, in handling dynamic references within the DAG. This strategy not guarantees data availability but also makes intelligent replication decisions based on the importance of the data.

Parameters:

$R$ : Replication count for a specific shard.
$Pfail$ : Probability of a node containing a cell becoming inaccessible.
$ρ$ : Redundancy ratio — a factor balancing storage overhead against resilience.

Mathematical Model:

The redundancy ratio $ρ$ is mathematically expressed as:

$\rho = \frac{R \times (1 - P_{\text{fail}})}{|C|}$

This ratio indicates the likelihood of maintaining shard accessibility even during multiple node outages.

Advanced Replication Techniques:

Cell Data Significance Metric (CDSM): An algorithmic strategy to evaluate and rank shards based on multiple parameters such as frequency of access, data age, and inherent importance. Mathematically, CDSM can be represented as: $CDSM(Si)=w1×AccessFrequency(Si)+w2×DataAge(Si)+w3×InherentImportance(Si)$ Where $w1,w2$ and $w3$ are weights representing the significance of each parameter.
Dynamic Replication Method (DRM): Using the CDSM ranking, DRM dynamically adjusts the replication factor $R$ . Shards with higher significance are given priority, receiving a greater replication count. $R=DRM(CDSM(Si))$ Where $DRM$ is a function mapping the CDSM score to an appropriate replication count.

Inputs:

A shard $Si$ from cell data.
CDSM ranking of the shard.
Desired redundancy ratio $ρ$ .

Outputs:

Optimized replication count $R$ for shard $Si$ .

5. Interactions Between Cells

To navigate the complexities of a DAG structure it is essential for the individual cells to communicate and interact with each other. These interactions are crucial, for maintaining the integrity, efficiency and coherence of the entire system.

5.1 Cell Communication Fundamentals:

Communication Channel: Each cell has its specific communication channels that enable it to form connections, with the cells it originated from the cells it gives rise to and sometimes even with unrelated cells.

Message Types:

Validation Requests: Sent from child cells to parent cells to verify transaction data.
Propagation Notices: Notifications sent by parent cells to their offspring cells regarding transactions.
Consensus Queries: Inquiries related to the current state or weight of a cell.

Cell Identifiers: Each individual cell is assigned a cryptographic hash guaranteeing both secure and specific communication.

5.2 Communication Protocols:

5.3 Handshake Protocol:

In our DAG structure the Handshake Protocol plays a vital role in enabling secure communication between cells with a focus, on efficiency and maintaining integrity.

Initiation Phase:

A cell that wants to initiate communication sends a request, for a handshake, including its ed25519 signature and a special nonce.

Authentication via ed25519:

The receiving cell checks if the initiating cell is genuine, by comparing the ed25519 signature. Verified and valid signatures are allowed to proceed to the next stage.

Zero-Knowledge Proof Exchange:

To enhance security measures the receiving cell produces a proof known as zk proof to confirm its identity without disclosing any details. This zk proof along, with its nonce is then transmitted to the initiating cell.

Shared Secret Establishment:

Both cells utilize their nonces to employ a modified version of the Diffie Hellman method. This is combined with zero knowledge proofs to derive a shared secret without the need, for key exchange.

Secure Channel Activation:

The shared secret acts as the foundation, for a channel of communication protected by advanced cryptographic techniques based on the ed25519 curve.

Confirmation:

Both cells communicate with each other by exchanging acknowledgment messages to confirm that the handshake process was successful. This ensures that both parties are verified and that the communication channel remains secure.

5.4 Data Exchange Protocol:

Transmission Initialization:

When starting a data transfer the sending cell organizes the data into an defined binary structure. Each packet of data includes information, like sequence numbers, data type and timestamp.

Signature-based Authentication using ed25519:

Each data packet is attached with an ed25519 signature, which guarantees that the origin and integrity of the data can be verified. The recipient can confirm the authenticity of each packet by comparing it with the signature.

Error Detection and Correction:

By using Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes the protocol can recognize packets that have been corrupted. Often fix them without having to resend them. Additionally we also employ checksums, for each data packet, which are based on hashing algorithms. This allows us to identify any changes that might occur during transmission.

Flow Control and Congestion Avoidance:

The protocol uses techniques such as a sliding window and adaptive timeout strategies to avoid congestion, in the communication channels and ensure that data flows smoothly.

Acknowledgments and Retransmissions:

When receiver cells successfully receive and process data they send acknowledgment packets. If the sender doesn't receive an acknowledgment within a time period it assumes that the packet is lost and initiates a retransmission.

Encryption and Privacy using zk-proofs:

To uphold the security of data during transmission packets undergo encryption using state of the art techniques. In cases where an added layer of privacy's necessary zk proofs can be integrated enabling cells to verify the accuracy of encrypted information without accessing its actual contents.

5.5 Termination Protocol;

Once the data exchange is finished the cells employ a termination protocol to gracefully close the communication channel and release allocated resources.

5.6 Interaction Mechanisms:

Data Authentication; Child cells often refer to parent cells to verify the accuracy of transaction data.
Updating Weight Distribution; When cells receive updates and include transactions they share their revised weights with neighboring cells to ensure the Main Chain remains consistent.
Reporting Errors and Making Corrections; If a cell detects any discrepancies or anomalies it notifies cells and takes necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Requesting Additional Resources; When faced with tasks a cell may seek computational assistance from nearby cells.
Cross Verification, for Redundancy; Cells frequently communicate with each other to double check information. Ensure that outdated data is not retained.

5.7 Security Measures in Communication:

End-to-End Encryption; All the information exchanged between cells is protected with encryption to ensure that the data remains secure and confidential.

Authentication: Cells ensure the authenticity of each others signatures, before interacting thus preventing any possibility of impersonation or malicious attacks.

Rate Limiting; To avoid DDoS attacks or spam cells are designed with mechanisms to limit the influx of requests coming from sources.

5.8 Synchronization and Consistency:

To guarantee the functioning of the DAG structure it is essential for all cells to maintain synchronization regarding transaction history and weights.

Performing Regular Synchronization Checks; Cells regularly check with their neighboring cells to ensure that they have data.

Implementing Consensus Mechanisms; Since DAG operates in a distributed manner cells incorporate consensus mechanisms to ensure that in situations, like network partitioning or other issues the entire network can agree upon a single version of what is considered true.

6. Efficient Retrieval Mechanisms

Understanding and navigating the complexities of a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) requires a combination of speed, precision and flexibility. We have developed strategies to tackle these challenges by incorporating dynamic tiering and predictive machine learning. This helps us optimize data retrieval within the structure of a DAG.

6.1 Tiered Hierarchical Hash Indexing

Using a method the data in the DAG is organized into different categories such, as 'hot' 'warm' and 'cold' zones. This helps to optimize storage expenses and retrieval speeds.

Mathematical Framework: Define $I$ as our index function: $I:T→P$ . For each transaction $T$ , $P$ specifies its DAG position and associated storage tier.

6.2 Clustered Communication Channels

To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of data management we suggest implementing a system called Clustered Communication Channels (CCC). This method involves organizing cells into groups based on specific criteria. By structuring the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) in this manner we create channels, for communication that significantly decrease transaction and data retrieval burdens.

Fundamentals of Clustered Communication Channels:

Cell Clustering Criterion: The criterion for clustering cells could range from the nature of transactions they handle (e.g., financial, identity, health data), their frequency of access, or even their geographical origin. Formally, let $C=f(ci)$ where $C$ is the cluster, $ci$ is the individual cell, and $f$ is the clustering function.
Direct Communication Paths: Within a cluster, cells establish direct communication references. This direct linkage ensures rapid data exchanges without the need to traverse the larger DAG. If $R$ represents the reference function, a direct path between cell $ci$ and cell $cj$ can be represented as $R(ci,cj)$ .
Cluster Headers: Each cluster has a header cell responsible for maintaining a summary of the cluster's data, facilitating faster data lookups and interactions with external clusters. Let $H$ be the function denoting a cluster's header, such that $H(C)$ gives the header of cluster $C$ .

Enhancing Clustered Communication Channels:

Dynamic Cluster Resizing: By utilizing algorithms clusters have the ability to adjust their size dynamically according to expected transaction loads. This guarantees that no cluster will become a hindrance, in the system.
Inter-Cluster Linking: Clusters primarily handle references but establishing effective connections between clusters is essential for transactions involving cells, across clusters. It would be valuable to employ an algorithm possibly based on machine learning to optimize the establishment of these interconnections.
Priority Channels: To ensure that time sensitive data is handled quickly special channels can be set up that bypass the hierarchy of clusters. This allows for retrieval and transmission of data.

Mathematical Framework:

Cluster Formation Function: Let $C=f(ci,θ)$ where $θ$ is the cluster criterion. This function groups cells into clusters based on $θ$ .
Direct Communication Reference: For any two cells $ci$ and $cj$ in cluster $C$ , the direct communication path is given by $R(ci,cj∣C)$ .
Inter-Cluster Communication: Let $IC(Cx,Cy)$ be a function denoting an optimized communication path between clusters $Cx$ and $Cy$ .

7. Garbage Collection and Maintenance

In an decentralized data storage system it is crucial to effectively manage resources. As time passes and data is added, changed or removed there is a possibility of accumulating cells, references that are no longer needed or outdated information. Processes, for garbage collection and maintenance help. Address these redundancies to ensure the system operates efficiently responds promptly and avoids unnecessary resource usage.

7.1 Garbage Collection:

Garbage collection (GC) refers to the process of identifying and reclaiming cells that're no longer in use or necessary. The main objectives of this process are;

Reclaiming Space: Freeing up storage space occupied by orphaned or unused cells.
Optimizing Access: To enhance the speed of accessing information it is possible to improve by eliminating any data.

7.2 Maintenance:

In addition, to garbage collection maintenance involves a scope of tasks which include;

Data Integrity Checks: Making sure that the data stored remains unchanged. Hasn't been inadvertently altered.
Re-indexing: Periodically updating indexes to ensure efficient data retrieval.
Defragmentation: We're rearranging the storage system to make sure that data is stored in a manner, which will enhance the speed at which we can access it.

7.3 Algorithmic Foundation:

For garbage collection, we can use a mark-and-sweep approach:

Mark Phase: Start traversing the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) from the root nodes and label all cells that can be reached.
Sweep Phase: Go through the storage and recover any cell that has not been labeled.

8. ZK-stark Integration

To achieve security, data privacy and a resilient DAG architecture it is crucial to integrate zk STARKs (Zero Knowledge Scalable Transparent Arguments of Knowledge). These cryptographic proofs provide transparency without the need for a trusted setup. Ensure post quantum security. This makes them a forward thinking option, for ensuring the integrity of the storage system by recovering any unmarked cells.

8.1 Introduction to zk-STARKs

zk STARKs refer to a kind of zero knowledge proofs that enable a prover to persuade a verifier, about the truthfulness of a statement while keeping the details of the statement confidential. This characteristic ensures both the privacy and integrity of data.

8.2 Mathematical Foundation

Given a function $f$ and an input $xx$ with its corresponding output $y$ , a prover wants to prove they know an input $x$ such that $f(x)=y$ without revealing $x$ .

The proof, typically denoted as $π$ , is generated for this claim.

$π=STARK(f,x,y)$

The verifier then checks the proof:

$Verify(π,f,y)→True/False$

8.3 Data Privacy Enhancement

When zk STARKs are utilized the DAG effectively conceals information. In the event of a transaction involving data only a verification proof of the transactions legitimacy is retained on the DAG without storing the actual data. This approach safeguards both the veracity of the transaction. Maintains personal privacy.

8.4 Scalability and Efficiency

zk STARKs are known for their scalability when compared to types of zero knowledge proofs. They have a proof size and require less time for verification, which is particularly beneficial as the complexity of the statement being proven increases. This makes zk STARKs well suited for large scale systems such, as a directed graph (DAG).

8.5 Quantum Resilience

In an advancing world of quantum computing it becomes crucial for cryptographic techniques to be resistant to quantum threats. Zk STARKs naturally possess this quality guaranteeing the security of the DAG against any future attacks, from quantum computers.

8.6 Integration into DAG Retrieval

When someone requests to retrieve data from a transaction that is protected by zk STARKs the system verifies the associated proof without revealing the data of the transaction. This ensures that transaction information remains private while still enabling its verification.

8.7 Proof Generation and Verification

To ensure the security of data transactions the DAG system generates a zk STARK proof automatically. This proof is then verified by nodes, in the network guaranteeing the transactions legitimacy while protecting the privacy of the data.

9. Example: Cell Transaction with Real Estate and Reference Cells

Considering the structure of our cells and the smart techniques we use for compression, deduplication and expansion lets explore a scenario involving a real estate transaction;

Imagine a situation where a user wants to record the sale of a property. In this case the primary cell would hold all the details of the transaction. However because of the complexity of the document it may be necessary to divide it into reference cells that contain specific information such, as property details, legal clauses and images.

class Cell {
private:
    std::string data;
    std::vector<Cell*> references;

public:
    Cell(const std::string& data) : data(data) {}
    
    void addReferenceCell(Cell* refCell) {
        references.push_back(refCell);
    }
    
    std::string retrieveCompleteData() {
        std::string completeData = data;
        for (auto refCell : references) {
            completeData += refCell->retrieveCompleteData();
        }
        return completeData;
    }
};

int main() {
    // Main transaction cell for a real estate sale
    Cell realEstateSale("SaleDetails: PropertyID-12345; Price-$500,000");

    // Reference cells containing additional data
    Cell propertyDetails("PropertyDetails: 3BHK, 2 Baths, 1500 sq.ft.");
    Cell legalClauses("LegalClauses: No liabilities, Clear title");
    Cell images("Images: FrontView.jpg, InsideView.jpg");

    // Linking reference cells to the main transaction cell
    realEstateSale.addReferenceCell(&propertyDetails);
    realEstateSale.addReferenceCell(&legalClauses);
    realEstateSale.addReferenceCell(&images);

    // Retrieving the complete transaction details
    std::cout << realEstateSale.retrieveCompleteData() << std::endl;

    return 0;
}

In this case the primary cell for transactions includes connections to other cells that hold supplementary information regarding the sale. When fetching the transaction data, from all associated cells is combined to offer a perspective. This arrangement guarantees storage while accommodating intricate and diverse transactions.

10. Intelligent Compression

Intelligent Compression refers to the use of algorithms and methods to reduce the size of data allowing for storage and faster transmission. This approach is particularly important in systems, like DAG, where optimizing space utilization's critical. Intelligent Compression not aims to decrease file sizes but also ensures that the original data can be reconstructed without any loss.

9.1 Mathematical Background:

Given a data set $D$ , the compression function $C$ aims to map $D$ to a smaller set $D′$ such tht:

$C:D→D′$

And the decompression function $DC$ maps it back:

$DC:D′→D$

Ideally, applying the decompression function after compression should retrieve the original data:

$DC(C(D))=D$

10.2 Compression Techniques:

10.2.1 Huffman Coding:

The goal of Huffman coding is to compress data by assigning variable length codes to characters. The length of each assigned code is determined by the frequency of the character.

10.2.2 Run-Length Encoding (RLE):

Run Length Encoding (RLE) is a method employed to compress data. Its functionality revolves around representing instances of the same data value as a singular value accompanied by its count. This approach proves efficient in scenarios where there exist repeated sequences of data elements.

10.2.3 Dictionary-based Compression:

LZW, abbreviated as Lempel Ziv Welch follows a method where it creates a dictionary containing the strings found in the provided data. This dictionary is then used to refer to strings of relying on the original data, for compression purposes.

10.3 Adaptive Compression:

The effectiveness of compression algorithms can vary as data changes over time. To address this adaptive compression techniques are employed to modify the algorithms parameters based on the data being compressed at any given moment.

10.4 Intelligent Selection:

When working with a dataset it can be beneficial to employ compression methods depending on the distinct properties of the data. Through the use of machine learning we can determine the appropriate algorithm to use based on the features of the incoming data.

11. Smart De-duplication

Smart deduplication is a technique designed to identify and eliminate data entries from the storage system. This method is especially beneficial in decentralized systems like DAG, where data propagation and replication happen frequently. By implementing deduplication you can achieve storage savings. Improve data transmission speeds. The key idea is to store each piece of data only once and have any duplicate references point back, to the original entry. This not optimizes storage but also ensures the integrity and consistency of the data.

11.1 Mathematical Foundation:

Let $S$ represent the storage set containing all data instances. A de-duplication function $F$ maps the entire set $S$ to a smaller set $S′$ by eliminating duplicates:

$F:S→S′$

Where: $∣S′∣<∣S∣$

And for every data instance $d$ in $S$ :

$d∈S′ or ∃ a reference rd pointing to d$

11.2 De-duplication Strategies:

11.2.1 Hash-based De-duplication:

Each incoming data instance undergoes a process of being encrypted using a hash function. This encryption generates an identifier known as the hash value. If the hash value already exists in the storage system it indicates that the data is a duplicate.

11.2.2 Content-aware De-duplication:

This technique examines the information in the data. By utilizing machine learning or pattern recognition it can detect redundancies even if they are not matches in terms of bytes, such, as comparable images or documents that have undergone slight modifications.

11.3 Reference Management:

When a duplicate data instance is found, than storing it again we store a reference that points to the original data instance. This reference takes up less space compared to the actual data.

11.4 Considerations:

Hash Collisions: In hash based de duplication there is a small possibility that two distinct data instances will generate the same hash resulting in incorrect de duplication. It is crucial to employ hash functions that reduce this risk to a minimum.
Computational Overhead: Although the process of de duplication has its benefits, in terms of storage efficiency it can also lead to increased workload particularly when retrieving data and resolving references.
Data Integrity: It is crucial to prioritize the prevention of deletion of the original data during the removal of duplicates.
Temporal Dynamics: Over time as data continues to evolve or get deleted some of the references that were saved earlier might end up pointing to data that's no longer available or has become outdated. It is crucial to verify and tidy up these references.

12. Datastorage

Our innovative cellular framework, along with a referencing system and columnar data tables is set to transform current data repositories and blockchains. By paying a one time storage fee users gain the capability to store any type of data indefinitely and even update it by creating a reference, for the original cell. This storage approach guarantees independence from third party intermediaries. Eliminates recurring costs. It holds the potential to render blockchains and data structures obsolete offering a scalable, secure and open source alternative.

12.1 Adaptive and Secure Data Storage

Adaptable Cell Capacity; The Base Cells (BCs) and Reference Cells (RCs), within the DAG can adapt their capacity depending on the complexity of the data they hold. This ensures that space is utilized efficiently while meeting the needs of the data.

Structured Hierarchical Storage; Datasets are arranged hierarchically which facilitates storage and retrieval of data by minimizing the need, for extensive searching across multiple reference cells.

Enhanced Security with zk STARK; We ensure the security of data, within our cell structure by integrating zk STARK technology. This guarantees that information is safeguarded without compromising storage efficiency.

12.2 Endowment Fund Mechansim

To guarantee the durability and long term viability of our Data Storage model we have implemented a sound endowment fund mechanism. This model provides support, for both the storage of data and the ongoing financial stability of the system. Here's a detailed explanation;

12.2.1. Setting Up the Fund:

Initial Fee Structure: Let $Cs$ represent the actual storage cost for a user. Users are charged a one-time fee $F$ where $F=Cs+δ$ . Here, $δ$ is the surplus margin, earmarked for our endowment fund.
Fund Accumulation: Over time, as more users avail of the service, the fund $Fn$ accumulates as: $Fn=∑i=1nδi$ , where $n$ represents the number of transactions.

12.2.2. Automated Fund Management:

Algorithmic Allocation: Given a predefined risk-return profile, our algorithm $A$ distributes fund assets across different investment avenues such as bonds $B$ , equities $E$ , and other assets. Allocation fractions can be represented as $fB$ , $fE$ , etc., where $fB+fE+...=1$ .
Periodic Optimization: Every $t$ time units, $A$ recalculates allocation fractions based on prevailing market conditions to optimize returns while adhering to risk constraints.

12.2.3. Investment Strategy:

Portfolio Yield: The expected yield $Y$ on the portfolio can be modeled as: $Y=fB×rB+fE×rE+...$ , where $rB,rE,...$ are the respective returns on bonds, equities, etc.
Adaptive Rebalancing: Given market volatility $V$ , if $V>Vthreshold$ (a predefined threshold), the algorithm triggers a portfolio rebalance to maintain risk-return equilibrium.
Compound Growth: Let $Gt$ represent the growth at time $t$ . With reinvestment, $Gt+1=Gt+Gt×Y$ .

12.2.4. Sustainability and Future Assurance:

Operational Cost Coverage: Let $Co$ be the operational costs per time unit. As long as $Y×Fn>Co$ , the fund remains self-sustaining, ensuring users face no additional fees.
Projection: Using time-series forecasting models like ARIMA or Exponential Smoothing, we can project the fund's growth $Gt+n$ and ensure that our strategy aligns with long-term sustainability.

12.3 One-Time Storage Fee

To get a grasp of the costs associated with storing data on blockchain it's important to analyze the fee structure in a quantitative manner. Now lets explore each element of the fees deeply;

1. Base Charge for Transaction Storage:

Cost Determinants: The base fee, denoted by $Bf$ , for storing a transaction in the blockchain is derived based on various components. This includes storage infrastructure costs $Si$ , maintenance overheads $Mo$ , and potential future upgradations $Ug$ . Mathematically: $Bf=Si+Mo+Ug$
Depreciation Adjustment: Taking into account the wear and tear of infrastructure, we can adjust the cost as: $Bf=Bf−Dt$ where $Dt$ is the depreciation at time $t$ .

2. Fee for Reference Cells:

Dynamic Pricing Model: If a transaction requires the creation of reference cells, then the fee is influenced by the number of reference cells, denoted by $nRC$ . Given $RCf$ as the fee for each reference cell: $RCtotal=nRC×RCf$
Complexity Index: The fee may vary based on the complexity of data stored in each reference cell. Let $Cxi$ represent the complexity index of the $ith$ reference cell: $RCadjusted=∑i=1nRCRCf×Cxi$

3. Encryption Fee with zk STARK:

Computational Cost Modeling: The encryption fee, denoted by $zkf$ , is influenced by the computational intricacy $CI$ of the zk STARK procedures. The greater the complexity, the higher the resources required: $zkf=k×CI$ where $k$ is a constant representing computational cost per unit of complexity.
Latency Adjustment: Given the urgency of some transactions, the fee can be adjusted based on the latency $L$ desired. Lower latency would mean a slightly higher fee: $zkadjusted=zkf−(l×L)$ where $l$ is a latency discount constant.

Fee Calculation Formula: $TotalFee=Bf+RCadjusted+zkadjusted$

Where:

$Bf$ denotes the adjusted base fee for transaction storage.
$RCadjusted$ is the total fee associated with the complexity-adjusted reference cells.
$zkadjusted$ is the fee imposed for zk-STARK encryption, adjusted for latency.

13. Parallel Chaining Mechanism

The concept of chaining brings about a significant change from the traditional linear blockchain models. It offers an scalable solution for processing and validating transactions.

13.1 The Idea of Parallel Chaining;

Traditional linear blockchain systems face scalability limitations because blocks are sequentially added. Our DAG architecture addresses this by using a chaining mechanism, where multiple chains, known as "bubbles " work together.

13.2 Selecting the Main Chain;

Within the interconnected network of cells we identify a lineage called the "Main Chain." This chain serves as the backbone, for the structure and guides network operations. Other cells that are not part of this lineage are considered side branches.

Purpose of the Main Chain:

Transaction Verification: The main chain expedites transaction verification, ensuring efficient network operations.
Consensus: A uniform main chain helps maintain a consensus across the network nodes.

Mathematical Model:

Initialization: Every cell, denoted as $c$ , is initialized with a weight: $weight(c)=1$ .

Weight Calculation: Given a new cell $c$ with parent cells represented by $P(c)={p1,p2,...,pn}$ , the weight is computed as:

$weight(c)=1+∑i=1nweight(pi)$

11.3 Main Chain Selection Algorithm:

To determine the main chain:

Commence from the newest cell in the DAG.
Retrace to its parent cells.
Select the parent cell with the maximum weight.
Continue this selection process until reaching the genesis cell, thereby defining the main chain.

13.4 Parallel Chaining Optimization:

The use of chaining taps into the capabilities of simultaneous processing. However it is crucial to employ optimization techniques to ensure functioning.

Load Balancing; To ensure distribution of transactions and avoid any single chain causing congestion the system divides them evenly among different sections.
Adaptive Merging; In situations where a secondary branch gains importance or weight strategies are developed to incorporate it into the chain promoting overall network stability.
Fault Tolerance; With multiple chains operating the system is designed to handle failures. If one chain encounters an issue transactions can be redirected through chains.
Bubble Pruning; Outdated or relevant sections that do not significantly contribute to the main chain can be removed to optimize resources and maintain network flexibility.
Intelligent Prefetching; By anticipating the path of the main chain upcoming transactions can be fetched in advance ensuring efficient validation processes.

14. Transaction Prioritization

In the world of blockchain transaction cells play a crucial role and require careful attention and strategic handling. By prioritizing these cells wisely we not only ensure the seamless flow of transactions but also guarantee a satisfying performance for all participants, in the blockchain ecosystem.

14.1 Delving into Mathematical Narratives:

To explore the realm of prioritizing transactions we rely on mathematical stories that provide us with concrete measures of effectiveness and help us in our continuous pursuit to improve system performance.

Let $T$ encapsulate the entirety of transactions, poised in the wings, awaiting their turn for confirmation.

$P$ , then, signifies those transactions selected for prioritization, stepping into the limelight a touch sooner than their counterparts.
$tregular$ and $tprioritized$ narrate the average time-tales of regular and prioritized transactions, respectively.

The temporal advantage gained through prioritization, expressed as $Δt$ , is calculated using the following expression:

$Δt=tregular−tprioritized$

And extending this narrative to the cumulative efficiency stage, embodied by $E$ , where $P$ transactions are expedited, we formulate:

$E=P×Δt$

14.2 Crafting the Parameters of Prioritization:

Establishing Criteria; To determine which transactions take precedence we must consider factors such as transaction fees the age of the transaction and the reputation of the initiating party. The decisions made behind the scenes shape how our transactions unfold on the stage.
Fine tuning Processing Dynamics; It is crucial to reassess and adjust the timing dynamics between regular and prioritized transactions to ensure a flexible and responsive performance that aligns with the ever changing nature of blockchain interactions.
Managing Transaction Queue; Within the queue a meticulous and dynamic coordination takes place. Effectively managing this coordination whether through segmentation or parallel processing lanes for standard and prioritized transactions plays a vital role, in achieving a seamless dance of transactions.

15. Picture & Video Management (in process)

In todays age the production and consumption of multimedia content, such, as images and videos have become incredibly prevalent. To address the needs of multimedia data we have carefully designed our cell based DAG architecture. This architecture allows us to meet these requirements without depending on services ensuring continuous storage capabilities.

15.1 Comprehensive Multimedia Understanding: Multimedia content, such as images and videos possesses qualities that set it apart from text or numerical data. These files are often rich, in information. Require significant storage capacity and specialized decoding techniques. In our system we give high priority to effectively storing and quickly accessing multimedia data.

15.2 Smart Compression and Segmentation in DAG Cells:

Advanced Compression Techniques:
- Images: We utilize cutting edge lossless algorithms, like WebP to ensure top notch quality. In cases where its acceptable to make compromises in quality we also make use of JPEG or similar lossy approaches.
- Videos: We utilize cutting edge codecs such, as H.265 or AV1 to achieve compression while maintaining the integrity of visual quality.
Intelligent Segmentation: With the large amount of multimedia content available it is crucial to divide them into units for easier storage, on cell phones. This not helps in using storage space efficiently but also improves the speed of accessing and ensures redundancy.
$F1,F2,...,Fn$ Where each $Fi$ symbolizes a segment of the primary multimedia content within a specific cell.

15.3 Metadata Mastery: Post-segmentation, each multimedia unit is endowed with rich metadata, encapsulating:

Format & Codec Data: Vital for appropriate decoding and rendering.
Ordering Metadata: Crucial for holistic content reconstruction.
Integrity Hashes: To guarantee data authenticity.
Reference Cells: Act as a beacon for corresponding data fragments and ancillary metadata.

Following the structure of our DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) architecture we allocate cells to store metadata. These cells utilize reference mechanisms to locate the corresponding data shards.

15.4 Reliability through Redundancy: The importance of multimedia data highlights the need for accessibility. Therefore we enhance redundancy methods by increasing the replication factor (R), for multimedia cells aligning with their significance.

15.5 Seamless Retrieval & Restoration: Upon multimedia data requisition, our DFS embarks on:

Concurrent Retrieval; By utilizing the cell chaining architecture we can retrieve fragments simultaneously.
Seamless Integration; With metadata as our guide we seamlessly merge segments together bringing the entity back, to life.
Efficient Decoding; Leveraging the codec specified in the metadata we accurately decode the data preparing it for flawless rendering.

PreviousDAG Connection NextFlipper Loop

Last updated 7 months ago